Legal Opinion

Mabry v. Conocophillips Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 19, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00039Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MONTE MABRY, Plaintiff, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Case No. 3:20-cv-00039-SLG et al., Defendants. ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS On January 29, 2020, Plaintiff Monte Mabry commenced this action against ConocoPhillips Company and the Benefits Committee of the ConocoPhillips Retirement Plan (together, the “ConocoPhillips Defendants”), and Alight Solutions, LLC in state court. On February 19, 2020, the ConocoPhillips Defendants filed a notice of removal.1 On June 5, 2020, Mr. Mabry filed an amended complaint alleging…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API