Picow v. Baldwin
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This is an appeal by. plaintiff-appellant Charles Picow: from a judgment entered after an instructed verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, Clarence. E. “Teak” Baldwin, and from a denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. We shall refer to these parties as plaintiff and defendant.
Plaintiff’s complaint stated a claim for relief for an assault alleged to have been committed upon him by defendants Baldwin, John Doe, and Richard Roe. The fictitious defendants were subsequently identified as Jack B. Bradshaw and Bud E. Linderman, but were never served with summons nor did they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Bassett v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casey v. Beaudry Motor CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. VillalobosArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Avechuco v. AwtreyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- US Manganese Corporation v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.