Legal Opinion
Nocera v. Lamattina
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
It appears from the finding that the defendant-appellant was the owner of a house and lot in Waterbury and desiring to sell it, enlisted the services of the plaintiff to find a purchaser for the property, agreeing to pay him three per cent on the sale price. The plaintiff thereupon offered it to a Mrs. Bianca who lived with her husband in Waterbury. The families of Mrs. Bianca and the defendant were personal acquaintances. The price at which the property was offered to Mrs. Bianca not being satisfactory to her, she offered the plaintiff a lower price, which the plaintiff reported to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Plumb v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Osborn v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Elkin v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Chinigo v. EhrenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- MacArthur v. CannonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Schaeffer v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.