Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Young

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Demurrer by the defendant to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWeight, J.

It appears by the complaint that, in October, 1895, Macintosh & Booney, who were copartners under the firm name of “ The Niagara Clip Co.” in the manufacture and sale of paper clips, at Buffalo, N. Y., entered into a contract with Dennis J. & John F. Gaynor, who were copartners under the name of “ Gaynor & Mitchell Manufacturing Co.,” whereby the latter agreed to make and deliver to the Niagara Clip Co., at Bridgeport, Conn., 8,000 pounds of “ Niagara ” clips of spring brass wire, at the agreed price of twenty-one dollars ($21) per hundred pounds, and also to make the necessary tools therefor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Baumann v. . PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Kelso v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Canda v. . WickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Shaw v. McGregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leckie v. BennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Stokes v. WatkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Fuller v. City Nat. Bank of HuronDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API