Legal Opinion

California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1919No. Civ. No. 2933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Shortall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for alleged breach of a contract to furnish material for making boxes. Defendant, after demurrer (general as to the point here involved), overruled, denied generally and specifically the allegations of the complaint, and by way of cross-complaint set up a common count for goods, to wit, box-shook, sold and delivered. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff as prayed, but offset the damages by the amount claimed in the cross-complaint and entered judgment accordingly. Defendant appeals on the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint alleges the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Kellogg v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bogie v. BogieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Burns v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Davies v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Cooney v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Great Western Lumber Co. v. Calif. Canneries Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Great Western Lumber Co. v. California Canneries Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API