Legal Opinion

State v. Seglen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2005No. 20040094PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott Seglen appealed a criminal judgment based on his conditional guilty plea entered after the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence in his minor-in-possession case. He argues the evidence was obtained during an unconstitutional search and seizure. We find the pat-down search by a University of North Dakota police officer was unconstitutional. We reverse and remand to allow Seglen an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea.

I

[¶ 2] Seglen, a 20-year-old University of North Dakota student, attended a college hockey game at Ralph Engelstad Arena…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. JarasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Roy L. Bourgeois v. Bobby PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FasteenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API