Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2012No. 20110234PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Steven Schmidt appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of theft of property. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Schmidt’s motion to suppress evidence and his proposed jury instruction, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying his pre-trial motion.

I

[¶ 2] On November 1, 2010, after speaking with her financial institution, Capitol Credit Union, and noting suspicious withdrawals from her savings account, Heidi Blum notified the Mandan Police Department about two unauthorized uses of her automated teller…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ostalaza v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  2. State v. KordonowyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. OstbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. KolstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Marvin Holmes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API