Legal Opinion
Mitchell Coach Manufacturing Co. v. Stephens
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 2, 1998No. 4:97-cv-00429PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRETT, District Judge.
The Court has for decision the motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, filed by the Plaintiff, Mitchell Coach Manufacturing Company, Inc., (“Mitchell”) (Docket No. 31), and by the Defendants, Ronny Stephens (“Stephens”) and TexStar National Bank (“TexStar”) (Docket No. 36). 1 After a comprehensive review of the record and applicable legal authority, the Court concludes the partial motion for summary judgment of the Defendants (Docket No. 36) should be sustained. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 31) is hereby overruled.
Undisputed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Windon Third Oil And Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Villa v. Alvarado State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. WintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2002
- Sutton v. SniderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Jacobo v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.