Legal Opinion
Driver Pipeline Co. v. Mustang Pipeline Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided February 13, 2002No. 06-00-00053-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice GRANT.
This is an appeal by Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. (Driver) and Mustang Pipeline Company, Inc. (Mustang) from a judgment in a lawsuit for breach of contract. Seaboard Surety Company, the insurer that provided a performance bond for Driver, is before this court as a cross-appellee.
Mustang wanted to build a gas pipeline from Longview to Diboll to Mount Belview (near Houston), a 200-mile stretch of pipeline. Mustang divided the work into the north spread and the south spread, each 100 miles long. After going through a bidding process, Mustang hired Driver to dig…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Dredging, Inc. v. De-Kaizered, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Tri-Star Petroleum Co. v. Tipperary Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Continental Dredging, Inc. v. De-Kaizered, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Continental Dredging, Inc. v. De-Kaizered, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Daniel Garza, III. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.