Legal Opinion

Tri-Star Petroleum Co. v. Tipperary Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2003No. 08-02-00305-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSAN LARSEN, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arises from an operating agreement that governs a natural gas project in Australia known as the Comet Ridge Project. Tipperary Corporation, Tipperary Oil & Gas Corporation, and Tipperary Oil & Gas (Australia) Pty Ltd. (collectively “Tipperary”) are non-operating interest owners under the operating agreement. At the time of the events giving rise to this suit, Tri-Star Petroleum Company was the operator. 1

Exhibit C to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  2. Delfingen US-Texas, LP v. Guadalupe Valenzuela, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  3. Kosty v. SOUTH SHORE HARBOUR COMMUNITY ASSN. INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Quick v. Plastic Solutions of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2008
  5. In the Interest of S.M.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API