Legal Opinion

McClure v. Campbell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before Hamer, J. cited: Long v. Moler, 5 Ohio State Rep., 272. Almy v. Hunt, 48 111., 45. Ingalls v. Cook, 21 Iowa, 560. Rundell v. Lakey, 40 N. Y., 517. Chapman v. Kimball, 7 Neb., 399. cited : Boone on Real Property, 291. Rhine v. Ellen, 36 Cal., 362. 1 Greenleaf on ‘Evidence, 284. Stephen Dig., Art. 90, Chap. 12.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action by a vendee against the vendor to recover certain taxes paid by said vendee upon land pur*58chased by him from the vendor. On the trial of the cause in the court below, judgment was entered in favor of the vendor. There is a stipulation in the record that the action was originally brought before a justice of the peace, and appealed to the district court. The form of the action before the justice, however, does not appear, and the fact does not seem material in the case.

The object of this action is to recover the amount of taxes paid by the vendee, and for which the vendor was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. McClureNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Logan v. LuukinenOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bellamy v. ChambersNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rudd v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API