Rudd v. Dunlap

Opinion of the court by

Gillette, J.:

This action was heard and disposed of in the court below upon an' agreed case tinder sections 4419, 4420 and 4421 of the code. The question submitted is as to whether the plaintiff in error or the defendant in error should, under the agreed facts and the law, pay the taxes for the year 1898 upon property sold. By the agreed case it appears that plaintiff in error Louisa J. Rudd in June, 1898, sold to the defendant in error A. B. Dunlap certain real estate situated in Pottawatomie county, and executed to him a deed of general warranty. This deed by express…