Legal Opinion

Logan v. Luukinen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPipes, J.

The respondent, on January 1, 1920, leased to the appellants two lots in the City of Astoria for a term ending January 1, 1923. The first clause of the lease, which is the clause here in dispute, is as follows:

“The second parties [appellants] agree to pay to the first party [respondent] as rental for said premises during said term the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($650.00) per month during each and every month during said term, in advance on the first day of each and every month, and, in addition thereto, in case the taxes for state, county, municipal and other purposes upon said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reeve v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Norton v. GaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Cochran v. GuildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. McLaren v. ShebleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Merle-Smith v. Minnesota Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Ewauna Box Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gatens Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  5. Broadway-Madison Corp. v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API