Legal Opinion

State v. Beeson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 17, 1997No. 96-1247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

In this case we must determine whether administrative sanctions applied against a prisoner for escape from a correctional facility prevent a subsequent criminal action against the prisoner for escape. The trial court found the criminal action did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. U.S. Const. amend. V. Finding no error in the court’s ruling on this and other issues raised, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

In December, 1995, the defendant, Jamie Allen Beeson, was serving a criminal sentence at the North Central Correctional Facility (NCCF). During his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. David Lee MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State v. WashburneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Harpster v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. State of Iowa v. David Lee MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. State of Iowa v. David Lee MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API