Legal Opinion

Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. 38116Published

1Opinion of the Court

69 Wn.2d 392 (1966)

418 P.2d 443

LEE I. KUECKELHAN, Respondent,

v.

FEDERAL OLD LINE INSURANCE COMPANY (MUTUAL), Appellant.[*]

No. 38116.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 29, 1966.

Hay, Julin, Fosso & Sage (Eugene H. Sage, of counsel), J.R. Cissna, and Brodie, Fristoe & Taylor (Doane Brodie, of counsel), for appellant.

The Attorney General, Basil L. Badley, Assistant, Daniel Brink and Francis Hoague, Special Assistants, for respondent.

HAMILTON, J.

RCW 48.31.030[1] permits the Insurance Commissioner, for cause and under judicial supervision, to take possession of a domestic insurance…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API