Legal Opinion

Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Roche

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 1 Div. 793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroavn, Justice

(after stating the case).

It is perfectly clear, from the recitals and provisions of the contract, that its purpose and effect was to confer on Milling the power of control of the corporation in the conduct of its business to the end of improving and rehabilitating its business, and if instead of using this power to that end, he fraudulently used it to wreck and destroy the business, this constituted a breach of the contract, conferring on the complainant a right of action which he could enforce in an action at law, and the measure of his damages would be the value of the stock fixed by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Gulf Compress Co. v. Harris, Cortner & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Badger v. McNamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Appeal of Passyunk Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Rinehart v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. W & H MacHine & Tool Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Lee v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. City of Eufaula v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API