Legal Opinion

City of Eufaula v. Alabama Power Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1936No. 4 Div. 903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Following reversal of the cause on former appeal (Alabama Power Co. v. City of Eufaula, 232 Ala. 473, 168 So. 661), complainant’s bill was amended to seek the enforcement of a' vendor’s lien, and as last amended the chancellor sustained a demurrer thereto for want of equity, transferring the cause to the law side of the docket. Section 6492, Code 1923.

To review the ruling on such a decree, mandamus in lieu of appeal is the appropriate remedy. Jones v. Wright, 220 Ala. 406, 125 So. 645. The appeal will be dismissed. As to the mandamus proceedings, we have not overlooked the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Jones v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Kyle v. BellengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Sims v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Roberts v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Sims v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Merrill v. RitchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API