D.R.M. v. N.K.M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DUBOW, J.:
Appellant, D.R.M. (“Mother”), appeals from the March 31, 2016 Order denying her Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Petition”) that Mother filed in conjunction with numerous appeals she has filed in an acrimonious custody dispute between Mother and Ap-pellee, N.K.M. (“Father”). After careful review, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Mother’s IFP status and find, inter alia, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it included income from tax credits and refunds in its calculation of income for purposes of IFP eligibility.
A detailed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grant v. BlaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Amrhein v. AmrheinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Goldstein v. Haband Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. TickelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
3Cited by4 opinions
- Feingold, A. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Kovalev, S. v. Stepansky, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Shore v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Shore v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018