Shore v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
JUSTICE WECHT, Concurring
Dating back to the Magna Carta and its tenets of basic fairness is the maxim that the poor must have the ability to access the courts of justice. 1 The authority of the judiciary to permit litigants to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") mitigates the formidable cost of litigation to the indigent, ensuring that our courthouse doors are always open, even to those who are poor. This is the promise of Rule 240 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. Pa.R.C.P. 240. But this promise may prove illusory to the prisoner who seeks to litigate a non-frivolous claim, but is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Burns v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Carl D. Potnick v. Eastern State Hospital, Carl D. Potnick v. Suffolk PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.