Legal Opinion

Grant v. Blaine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 2005No. 22 WAP 2004PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Appellant, Demetrius J. Grant, appeals from the per curiam order of the Commonwealth Court quashing his appeal from the denials of his applications to proceed in forma pauperis. We reverse.

On June 8, 2003, appellant, a prisoner at the SCI Waynesburg, filed a prison condition litigation action, seeking to proceed informa pauperis. The trial court denied appellant’s request, citing 42 Pa.C.S. § 6602(a)(2)(ii), 1 finding the average monthly deposits to his prison account exceeded the filing fee.

Appellant filed an appeal with the Commonwealth Court, which entered a per curiam…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Sinwell, William v. Governor Milton Shapp, Governor of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Roberts v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Amrhein v. AmrheinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. D.R.M. v. N.K.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. SteckelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. A. Jacobs v. Superintendent M. Clark (SCI Albion) Secretary of Corrections J.E. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. C. Caldwell v. Sec. J. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API