Legal Opinion

VE CORP. v. Ernst & Young

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. D-3654PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this ease is whether filing an identical lawsuit in another state, when the original suit in this state is dismissed on the basis of forum non conveniens, renders the appeal of the Texas dismissal moot. We conclude that it does not and remand this cause to the court of appeals.

In a Texas state court, VE Corporation (“VE”) sued Ernst & Young for accounting malpractice in connection with work performed in California. Ernst & Young moved to dismiss the suit based on forum non con-veniens, and its motion was granted. VE appealed the trial court’s order. While the case was pending on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Project Engineering USA Corp. v. Gator Hawk, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. Quiroz v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Hornblower, Weeks, Noyes & Trask, Inc. v. ReedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ve Corp. v. Ernst YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. City of Austin v. L.S. Ranch, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Trulock v. City of Duncanville, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API