Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Yates
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 18, 2005No. Civ.A. 05-0332JDBPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lennie R. Mitchell, a police officer with the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”), brings this action against the District of Columbia and two supervisory police officers, Donald Yates and Renee Holden, alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and retaliation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (Count Four), the D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code §§ 2-1401.01 et seq. (Count Five), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count Three). He also raises causes of action…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Robinson-Reeder v. Am. Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Bonieskie v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.