Legal Opinion

Stierlen v. Stierlen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1907No. Civ. No. 375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

Plaintiff declined to amend her complaint after defendants ’ demurrer had been sustained, and judgment was entered against her. She prosecutes this appeal from the judgment.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff and defendant George Stierlen intermarried in February, 1886, and ever since have been and now are husband and wife; that in November, 1896, defendant George Stierlen, representing himself to be an unmarried man, procured a marriage license, authorizing him to marry one Rosa Scott, and was, after procuring such license, married to said Rosa Scott, who has since been known as…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GregorsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re the Estate of ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Stierlen v. StierlenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API