State v. Mullins
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 The sole question presented in this appeal is whether a motion to withdraw a guilty plea remains pending, even after the entry of a final judgment of conviction, if that motion was improperly denied. Defendant Morris T. Mullins argues that the district court improperly denied his timely motion to withdraw his guilty plea by failing to enter findings of fact relating to the motion’s denial. Later in the proceedings, the district court declined to consider the merits of two additional motions filed by Mullins seeking the withdrawal of his plea. Mullins filed those motions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Geraci v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Barnard v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- DOCTORS'COMPANY v. DrezgaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Iota, LLC v. Davco Management Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Anderson v. Wilshire Investments, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.