Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Kidd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2019No. Case No. 20150280PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 Salt Lake City requires that any individual employed by an escort service agency, or any other sexually oriented business, obtain a license from the City before providing services. When Karlie Kidd met an undercover Salt Lake City police officer at the Grand America Hotel and asked him for a "show-up" fee, she did not possess such a license. She did, however, have an escort services license from Midvale City. Salt Lake City nevertheless cited Kidd for offering escort services without a valid license.

¶2 State law authorizes Salt Lake City and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bonner County v. Western InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Chamberlain v. Golds GymUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Cheek v. Iron CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. RSA-Tumon, LLC v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc., and Sherif Antoun PhilipsSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  5. Ramos v. Cobblestone CentreUtah Supreme Court · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API