Skinner v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The primary issue presented is whether the doctrine of in pari delicto provides a defense to claims under state law when defendant stockbrokers induce plaintiffs to buy securities by representing that they have “inside information” which will result in those securities increasing in value. We conclude that the mere fact that the plaintiffs in such cases have attempted to act upon inside information unlawfully does not cause the doctrine of in pari delicto to raise an affirmative defense which will defeat otherwise valid claims for relief asserted under state law. We also…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Belk, Incorporated v. Meyer Corporation, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.