Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Balkcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1956No. 19431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. Under the common law, which was of force in this State until changed by statute (Foster v. Withrow, 201 Ga. 260, 262, 39 S. E. 2d 466), the return of an indictment by the grand jury was a necessary prerequisite to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State to try a person charged with a felony. Gordon v. State, 102 Ga. 673, 680 (29 S. E. 444), and cases there cited; Webb v. Henlery, 209 Ga. 447 (74 S. E. 2d 7); 42 C. J. S. 850, § 11. By Georgia Laws 1935, p. 116 (Code, Ann., § 27-704), the General Assembly changed the then-existing common law. By this act the court was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Webb v. HenlerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Wells v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Cook v. WierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Foster v. WithrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Balkcom v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Brackins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Groom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API