Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 25, 2006No. A06A1201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

Patrick Armstrong appeals the denial of his plea of former jeopardy. He contends that his indictment is barred by an earlier trial because a jury was impaneled and sworn before the prosecution was dismissed. We disagree because the trial court lacked jurisdiction in the absence of an indictment and therefore affirm.

The record shows that Armstrong was charged by accusation with two counts of terroristic threats and acts and two counts of aggravated stalking. The case came on for trial in the superior court, and Armstrong’s counsel announced that he was ready to proceed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Brackins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Roberson v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walker v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Hayward-El v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API