Legal Opinion
Alumet v. Cecil D. Andrus
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1979No. 78-1546PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment which held that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) does not have the authority to require a private party to reimburse BLM for any part of the cost of an environmental impact statement prepared in connection with the processing of an application for a right-of-way over public lands.
Alumet is a partnership and joint venture composed of three partners: National Steel, a Delaware corporation; Southmore, a Georgia corporation; and Earth Sciences, a Colorado corporation. Alumet is engaged in various mining operations in the states of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Public Serv. Co. of Colorado v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nevada Power Co. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Nevada Power Co. v. WattDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
- Sohio Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Yosemite Park v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Beaver, Bountiful, Enterprise v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.