Legal Opinion

Pallas v. Crowley, Milner & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1948No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 44,025PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

“Does the unauthorized publication of another’s photograph for the purpose of advertising or commercial gain give rise to an action for damages by the person whose photograph is thus published?”

Plaintiff filed a declaration which under the circumstances must be considered as setting up true facts, alleging as follows:

On or about April 23, 1946, plaintiff was in the employ of one Earl Carroll, a theatrical producer. The defendant was then and is now operating a retail department store in the city of Detroit. On or about said date, the said Earl Carroll employed Preston Sweet, an independent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rosa Parks v. Laface RecordsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Beaumont v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Eick v. Perk Dog Food Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API