Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Raiden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Beese. Madison superior court. September 7,1900.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, J.

1. It has been repeatedly ruled that points presented in a record but not insisted on in this court will be considered as having been abandoned. Brown v. Social Circle, 103 Ga. 573; Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Bank, 110 Ga. 559, and cases cited; Ballard v. Shaw, Ib. 265; Cooper v. Stonecypher, 111 Ga. 818; Moss v. Bohannon, Ib. 871. The present case was submitted by brief, and there was no insistence therein that the petition for injunction came too late; hence the point will not be considered.

2. This court can not decide a question unless it be presented by the bill of exceptions. Durham v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders Manufacturing Co. v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Durham v. CantrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Cooper v. StonecypherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Brown v. Mayor & Council of Social CircleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hood v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Rushing v. AkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Brinkman v. City of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API