Legal Opinion

von Gemmingen v. First National Bank of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1990No. S-3075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION.

H. von Gemmingen appeals the superior court’s holding on summary judgment1 that “a real estate escrow account placed in the attachee’s hand for collection, but not collected when the writ was served, cannot be reached by a writ of attachment.”2 The essential dispute is whether real estate escrow accounts managed pursuant to a judgment debtor’s instructions are subject to execution, regardless whether funds are present at the exact instant a levy of the execution is made. We hold that such accounts are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Weir v. GalbraithArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Steenmeyer Corp. v. Mortenson-NealAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Anchorage Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Anchorage Westward HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. von Gemmingen v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wagner v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Arcticorp v. C Care Services, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API