Legal Opinion

von Gemmingen v. First National Bank of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1995No. S-5967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

A bank held escrow accounts in the names of judgment debtors. The debtors had made assignments of proceeds from their accounts to various creditors. A judgment creditor, H. von Gemmingen, served a writ of attachment on the bank. The bank continued to honor the prior assignments, and charge regular escrow fees for the service. It appbed any surplus funds in the escrow accounts to the benefit of the judgment creditor. The judgment creditor challenged the bank’s right to continue making payments to the assignee creditors. He asserted that he had the right to the total…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Summers v. HagenAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Steenmeyer Corp. v. Mortenson-NealAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Harpster v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Anchorage Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Anchorage Westward HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. v. ColterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Arcticorp v. C Care Services, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Company, Inc. v. R.D. Colter, Jr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API