Legal Opinion

Barcellos And Wolfsen, Inc. v. Westlands Water District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1990No. 89-15098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

899 F.2d 814

20 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,672

BARCELLOS AND WOLFSEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,

and

Boston Ranch Company; Edwin R. O'Neill; West Haven Farming

Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, et al., Defendants,

and

United States Department of Interior, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-15098.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1989.

Decided March 16, 1990.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc June

7, 1990.

William M. Smiland, Donnelly, Clark, Chase & Smiland, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert L. Klarquist, U.S. Dept. of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  2. In Re Brichard Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
  3. San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Madera Irrigation District v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API