Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed July 7, 1998 [147 F.3d 1168] is withdrawn.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
BACKGROUND
The Colorado River and its tributaries are the major-sources of water in the arid Southwest. Careful in the years of drought, the United States has established reclamation projects to channel water where it is needed most and to head off disputes among water users. But in its efforts to settle some water rights disputes, sometimes the government creates others. This case involves one such dispute. A working familiarity with the history of water rights legislation in the Southwest is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Parmetex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District v. RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Captain Andy's Sailing, Inc. v. JohnsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
- Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. Citizens United for Resources and the Environment, and Desert Citizens Against Pollution, State of California Band of Mission Indians, Intervenors v. United States of America Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Department of the Interior Robert W. Johnson, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation United States of America, Imperial Irrigation District San Diego County Water Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District State of Nevada Southern Nevada Water Authority State of Arizona Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Western Urban Water Coalition, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees v. City of Calexico, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. Citizens United for Resources and the Environment, State of California Band of Mission Indians, Intervenors, and Desert Citizens Against Pollution v. United States of America Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Department of the Interior Robert W. Johnson, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation United States of America Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary William E. Rinne, Acting Commissioner, State of Arizona Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Western Urban Water Coalition Colorado River Commission of Nevada, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees, and Imperial Irrigation District San Diego County Water Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District State of Nevada Southern Nevada Water Authority Colorado River Commission of Nevada, Defendant-Intervenors v. City of Calexico, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. Citizens United for Resources and the Environment Desert Citizens Against Pollution, State of California Band of Mission Indians, Intervenors v. United States of America Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Department of the Interior Robert W. Johnson, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation United States of America Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary William E. Rinne, Acting Commissioner, and Imperial Irrigation District San Diego County Water Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District State of Nevada Southern Nevada Water Authority State of Arizona Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Western Urban Water Coalition Colorado River Commission of Nevada Colorado River Commission of Nevada, Defendant-Intervenors v. City of Calexico, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation And Drainage District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.