Legal Opinion

Great Plains Mutual Insurance v. Mutual Reinsurance Bureau

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 26, 1993No. 89-1226-SACPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

Great Plains Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Great Plains) brings this diversity of citizenship action against the defendant, Mutual Reinsurance Bureau (MRB). This dispute between an insurance company and its reinsurer essentially boils down to a factual dispute as to whether the damages caused by weather between August 17, 1987, and August 20, 1987, were caused by one or two *194storms. Under the terms of the reinsurance agreement, a “one storm” theory favors Great Plains; a “two storm” theory favors MRB.1

This case comes before the court upon MRB’s motion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BDO USA, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. Neuder v. Battelle Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API