Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hertz Corp. v. Rice

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1968No. 40811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The attempt by Hertz to obtain an Ohio motor vehicle certificate of title apparently arises fr.om a misunderstanding of the meaning of Section 4505.-04, Revised Code, which provides:

“No person acquiring a motor vehicle from the owner thereof, whether such owner is a manufacturer, importer, dealer, or otherwise, shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to said motor vehicle until such person has had issued to him a certificate of title to said motor vehicle, or delivered to him a manufacturer’s or importer’s certificate for it * * *.
“No court in any case at law or in equity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. TaggartOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. National Surety Co. v. BohnOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bill Dreiling Motor Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Birkett L. Williams Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API