Legal Opinion

United States v. Ford

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 23, 1999No. 98-0855/ARPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of violating a lawful general regulation by possessing an M22 TOW missile simulator, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. He also convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of possessing an explosive device in violation of a lawful general regulation, possessing an unregistered firearm, and unlaw*447fully making a firearm, in violation of Article 92, and Article 134, UCMJ, 10 USC § 934.1 The adjudged and approved…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. GunkleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. KreutzerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  5. Minehan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API