Legal Opinion
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 27, 2012No. Nos. 09-428C, 09-578CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case involves a claim for the provision of dining facility services for the United States Army at Camp Anaconda, one of the largest United States military bases in Iraq during the troop buildup following the March 2003 invasion. Its resolution calls for reconciliation of the prime contractor’s burden to provide reasonable justification — years after the fact — for claimed costs that were passed through to the prime contractor under fixed-price contracts with the reality that the costs were incurred during the exigencies of war.
FACTS1
I. Background
1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross and General Dynamics Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC v. BAE Systems Ordnance Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
- Ian, Evan & Alexander Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2018