Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Mulford
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa reported to the court that the respondent, Michael Mulford, had violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(5) and (6) of the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers based on his willful avoidance of prosecution on a federal indictment for almost ten years. The Commission recommended a public reprimand. Upon our de novo review, the court agrees that Mulford has committed an ethical violation. The court believes, however, that Mulford’s misconduct, aggravated by his actions during the course of the disciplinary process…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Fencl v. City of Harpers FerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- United States of America Ex Rel. Shell Oil Company v. Barco Corporation and John BarakatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GrotewoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HohenadelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.