Legal Opinion

Maasen v. Shaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2004No. ED 82750PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, owners of a servient estate, filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin defendant, owner of the dominant estate, from using a fifty-foot non-exclusive easement across the servient estate for purposes other than ingress and egress on a fifteen-foot roadway to defendant’s property. Defendant filed a counterclaim to recover damages. The trial court enjoined defendant’s use of all-terrain vehicles on the non-roadway portion of the easement, but denied plaintiffs’ requests that defendant be enjoined from widening the roadway, paving the roadway, cutting down trees…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Mahnken v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Baum v. Glen Park PropertiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burg v. DampierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Grider v. TingleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Picardi v. ZimmiondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API