Legal Opinion
Hernas v. City of Hickory Hills
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 3, 1981No. 80 C 2316PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Diane, Frank and Jadwiga Hernas have filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various portions of the Bill of Rights (also asserting pendent claims of common law replevin and negligence) against the City of Hickory Hills, its Mayor Ervin Kozicki (“Kozicki”) and various named and unnamed members of its Police Department and the Roberts Park Fire Protection District. Kozicki has counterclaimed against Diane Hernas (“Hernas”) charging slander, 1 and Hernas has moved to dismiss that counterclaim. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gail D. Konradi, Personal Representative of the Estate of Glenn J. Konradi v. United States of America and Robert E. FarringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, Cross v. Chicago Eastern Corporation, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Cleland v. StadtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Pape v. ByrdIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Fleming v. Kane CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.