Legal Opinion

Wantz v. Union Bank & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1934No. Docket No. 8080Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment against them based on the verdict of a jury awarding $21,269.21 as damages for alleged fraudulent representations in the purchase and sale of lands and as inducement to plaintiff’s entering into contracts for the improvement of the lands so agreed to be purchased.

It appears without question that the defendant Union Bank & Trust Company held the legal title to the lands in question for the benefit of the owner, Los Angeles County Farm Land Company, and J. M. Barteaux, who was purchasing them under an agreement to improve and sell the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Briggs v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Schenck v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Burrows Shoe Co., Inc. v. BrothertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API