Schenck v. Hartford Fire Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action upon a fire insurance policy. A demurrer, was interposed to the complaint and overruled. The defendant then filed an answer and went to trial before a jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff. From the judgment thereupon rendered, the defendant has appealed.
The cause comes here upon the judgment roll alone, in which the defendant contends that a reversible error appears, in this, that the complaint did not have attached thereto as an exhibit, or otherwise made a part thereof, the application for insurance, which it has been declared should be done, in Gilmore v.…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cohen v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.