Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Hartford Fire Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1886No. 11278PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This was an action upon a fire insurance policy. A demurrer, was interposed to the complaint and overruled. The defendant then filed an answer and went to trial before a jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff. From the judgment thereupon rendered, the defendant has appealed.

The cause comes here upon the judgment roll alone, in which the defendant contends that a reversible error appears, in this, that the complaint did not have attached thereto as an exhibit, or otherwise made a part thereof, the application for insurance, which it has been declared should be done, in Gilmore v.…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cohen v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API