Legal Opinion
Broocks v. Moss
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1919No. 72-2836PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Action by Jack Moss and another against John H. Brooclis and others. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and, it Raving been affirmed in part and reversed and rendered in part by the Court of Civil Appeals (175 S. W. 791), the named defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStrong, J.
On August 16, 1905, Jack Moss and his wife sold to H. P. Weir the standing timber on 331 acres of land in Tyler county. The deed conveying the timber, omitting the formal parts and the description, is as follows:
“Eor and in consideration of the sum of nineteen hundred and eighty-six dollars to us in hand paid by H. P. Weir, of San Augustine county, Tex., have granted, sold, and conveyed, and by these presents grant, sell, and convey, unto the said H. P. Weir, all of the timber now standing and growing on three huhdred and thirty-one (331) acres of land. situated in the county of Tyler, state…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BoykinTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Carter v. Clark & Boice Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Jasper County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
- Cummer Mfg. Co. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Davis v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Davis v. Haslam Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Foster v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.