Cummer Mfg. Co. v. Copeland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtSellers, J.
B. R. Copeland and Paul D. Smith owned the John Noland survey of 640 acres of land jointly, and some time in 1923 these parties secured a surveyor and established a division line between them. This line was plainly marked by the surveyor and was agreed upon by the parties ¡as the dividing line between their property and said line constituted the south boundary line of Paul Smith’s land and the north boundary line of B. R. Copeland’s land. A short while after this line was established, Paul Smith sold the timber off his land to Cummer Manufacturing Company. In making the sale to Cummer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carter v. Clark & Boice Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Moore Savage v. KopplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Ripy v. LessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Broocks v. MossTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schievink v. Wendylou Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Kirby Lumber Corporation v. Mrs. Mollie KarpelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Jochum Schievink and Vicki Schievink v. Wendylou Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.