Legal Opinion
Cierpial v. Ford Motor Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 9, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. Super. 489 (1954)
107 A.2d 61
FRANK CIERPIAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 28, 1954.
Decided July 9, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, FREUND and FRANCIS.
Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys).
Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys; Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
In this workmen's compensation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- McGowan v. Peter Doelger Brewing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Vandenberg v. John De Kuyper SonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Silagy v. STATE OF NJ AND COUNTY OF MERCERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968