Legal Opinion

People v. Prisco

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

In this motion to controvert a search warrant and to suppress the evidence obtained by means of the warrant, a hearing was held at which time the People produced, inter alia, evidence that I consider to be particularly somewhat devastating in quality.

The hearing, by stipulation of the parties, covered the two indictments involved herein, Indictment No. 1809 and Indictment No. 2281.

Briefly stated, without extending this opinion, the proof shows, with respect to the foregoing phase of the evidence,. that on March 24, 1969, at 2:30 p.m., the defendant, without ‘ ‘ bulges ’ ’ on his person, was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fiorenza v. GunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. BoylesNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API