Legal Opinion
Fiorenza v. Gunn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, with costs, to the extent that so much of the respondents’ determination as sustained the charge that petitioner refused to submit to a fitness for duty test after being so ordered by a supervisor is annulled, the penalty of dismissal is vacated, and the respondent New York City Transit Authority is directed to reinstate the petitioner to his position as car maintainer, the petition is otherwise denied, so much of the determination as sustained the charge that the petitioner, while on duty, was away from his work location without…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. VatajNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LoriaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Veras v. Truth Verification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Nocera v. New York City Fire CommissionerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Barretto v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Longo v. DolceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.