Legal Opinion

City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*693OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Legislature in enacting section 674 of the Insurance Law adopted a new procedure which authorizes first-party benefits with a resulting equitable adjustment between insurers without the need for the formalities applicable to claims and lawsuits. In our view the comprehensive nature of the no-fault legislation and the absence therefrom of any requirement for compliance with section 50-e or 50-i of the General Municipal Law indicates a legislative intent that the provisions of the latter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n v. BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cortlandt Nursing Care Center v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKenna v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Purex Industries, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Hunter v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Treanor v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API