City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*693OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Legislature in enacting section 674 of the Insurance Law adopted a new procedure which authorizes first-party benefits with a resulting equitable adjustment between insurers without the need for the formalities applicable to claims and lawsuits. In our view the comprehensive nature of the no-fault legislation and the absence therefrom of any requirement for compliance with section 50-e or 50-i of the General Municipal Law indicates a legislative intent that the provisions of the latter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n v. BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cortlandt Nursing Care Center v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- McKenna v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Purex Industries, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hunter v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Treanor v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.